Repository navigation
Question: Any objections to only allowing "rebase" commits in the repo? #3
Description
ATM, "merge commits" are enabled and used in this repository. Would there be an objection to stop using them here, in favor of using the "rebase"-type PR commits?
I ask because of the publish/release automation work I am doing - one potential way forward is to include/detect a keyword in the HEAD commit (of a PR) title, to trigger a new automated release. However it seems this mechanism would break is a PR is merged using "merge-commit", that adds a commit on top.
WDYT? I can submit a PR to modify this if the proposal is acceptable.
Activity
marcdumais-work commentedon Feb 20, 2024
BTW, I am willing to rework the commits of any of my PRs (e.g. squash them) if requested in a review, to keep a relatively tidy history.
waynebeaton commentedon Nov 18, 2024
Sorry for the long delay. I must have missed the notification that this issue had been created.
I have no problem with this.