Repository navigation
Nested properties, and more generally JSON_LD_1_1 #219
Description
I tested
Example 76: Nested properties
from the 1.1. spec (in progress):
https://json-ld.org/spec/latest/json-ld/#nested-properties
with the basic Java-json-ld program:
https://github.com/jsonld-java/jsonld-java#code-example
Adding this line in code:
options.setProcessingMode(JsonLdOptions.JSON_LD_1_1);
// or tried also
options.setProcessingMode(JsonLdOptions.JSON_LD_1_1_FRAME);and ... it fails ! :(
Exception in thread "main" com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdError: invalid term definition: 1.1
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.createTermDefinition(Context.java:330)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:279)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:142)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:286)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdApi.expand(JsonLdApi.java:543)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdApi.expand(JsonLdApi.java:997)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdProcessor.expand(JsonLdProcessor.java:146)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdProcessor.compact(JsonLdProcessor.java:51)
I found nothing regarding the status of Java-json-ld regarding JSON-LD 1.1 ;
I'm aware that this is a spec. in progress .
Activity
ansell commentedon Jan 24, 2018
Any contributions to support JSON-LD 1.1 features would be appreciated. So far the new features from the developing spec (that I am aware of) have not been specifically linked to JSON-LD 1.1.
gkellogg commentedon Jan 24, 2018
Not sure why you think that features being developed aren't linked to JSON-LD 1.1, as they're described in the 1.1 spec being developed by the CG, which is being used as input to the proposed WG (see charter.
Main things of interest to people are:
In general, make JSON-LD look more like regular JSON used in the field and address issues that have been raised in the last several years.
umbreak commentedon Aug 7, 2018
@reverse special key on framing would be another interesting feature to implement.
jeyendranbalakrishnan commentedon Nov 14, 2018
Hello, wondering if there are any plans to support the json-ld 1.1 spec in jsonld-java.
Thanks a lot!
ansell commentedon Nov 14, 2018
Any features that are sent as Pull Requests will be looked at, but there is no active work being done by me or Tristan on jsonld-java to add features for 1.1.
jeyendranbalakrishnan commentedon Nov 15, 2018
Thanks for the clarification, Peter!
lroffia commentedon Mar 6, 2019
Access to the following "@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/td.jsonld" raises the following:
com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdError: invalid term definition: 1.1
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.createTermDefinition(Context.java:334)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:281)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:209)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:144)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.Context.parse(Context.java:288)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdApi.expand(JsonLdApi.java:550)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdApi.expand(JsonLdApi.java:1027)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdProcessor.expand(JsonLdProcessor.java:146)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdProcessor.toRDF(JsonLdProcessor.java:505)
at com.github.jsonldjava.core.JsonLdProcessor.toRDF(JsonLdProcessor.java:555)
With reference to the specification 1.1 should be considered as number (looking at the code it seems like it accepts only as string)