Visitar URL original
urllib.parse doesn't round-trip file URI's with multiple leading slashes · Issue #78457 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

urllib.parse doesn't round-trip file URI's with multiple leading slashes #78457

Description

@cjerdonek
BPO 34276
Nosy @cjerdonek, @vadmium, @tirkarthi, @vladima, @epicfaace
PRs
  • bpo-34276: round-trip file URI's with multiple leading slashes #15297
  • Note: these values reflect the state of the issue at the time it was migrated and might not reflect the current state.

    Show more details

    GitHub fields:

    assignee = None
    closed_at = None
    created_at = <Date 2018-07-30.04:39:03.225>
    labels = ['3.7', '3.8', 'type-bug', 'library', '3.9']
    title = "urllib.parse doesn't round-trip file URI's with multiple leading slashes"
    updated_at = <Date 2019-08-27.01:16:36.907>
    user = 'https://github.com/cjerdonek'

    bugs.python.org fields:

    activity = <Date 2019-08-27.01:16:36.907>
    actor = 'epicfaace'
    assignee = 'none'
    closed = False
    closed_date = None
    closer = None
    components = ['Library (Lib)']
    creation = <Date 2018-07-30.04:39:03.225>
    creator = 'chris.jerdonek'
    dependencies = []
    files = []
    hgrepos = []
    issue_num = 34276
    keywords = ['patch']
    message_count = 9.0
    messages = ['322652', '322671', '322674', '322675', '322716', '322722', '322737', '322756', '324718']
    nosy_count = 6.0
    nosy_names = ['chris.jerdonek', 'martin.panter', 'piotr.dobrogost', 'xtreak', 'v2m', 'epicfaace']
    pr_nums = ['15297']
    priority = 'normal'
    resolution = None
    stage = 'patch review'
    status = 'open'
    superseder = None
    type = 'behavior'
    url = 'https://bugs.python.org/issue34276'
    versions = ['Python 3.6', 'Python 3.7', 'Python 3.8', 'Python 3.9']

    Linked PRs

    Activity

    1. cjerdonek commented on Jul 30, 2018

      @cjerdonek
      MemberAuthor

      urllib.parse doesn't seem to round-trip file URI's containing multiple leading slashes. For example, this--

          import urllib.parse
      
          def round_trip(url):
              parsed = urllib.parse.urlsplit(url)
              new_url = urllib.parse.urlunsplit(parsed)
              print(f'{url} [{parsed}]\n{new_url}')
              print('ROUNDTRIP: {}\n'.format(url == new_url))
      
          for i in range(4):
              round_trip('file://{}root/a'.format(i * '/'))

      results in--

      file://root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='root', path='/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file://root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: True
      
      file:///root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='/root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file:///root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: True
      
      file:////root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='//root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file://root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: False
      
      file://///root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='///root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file:///root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: False
      

      URI's of the form file:////<host>/<share>/<path> occur, for example, when one wants to git-clone a UNC path on Windows:
      https://stackoverflow.com/a/2520121/262819

      Here is where CPython defines urlunsplit():

      cpython/Lib/urllib/parse.py

      Lines 465 to 482 in 4e11c46

      def urlunsplit(components):
      """Combine the elements of a tuple as returned by urlsplit() into a
      complete URL as a string. The data argument can be any five-item iterable.
      This may result in a slightly different, but equivalent URL, if the URL that
      was parsed originally had unnecessary delimiters (for example, a ? with an
      empty query; the RFC states that these are equivalent)."""
      scheme, netloc, url, query, fragment, _coerce_result = (
      _coerce_args(*components))
      if netloc or (scheme and scheme in uses_netloc and url[:2] != '//'):
      if url and url[:1] != '/': url = '/' + url
      url = '//' + (netloc or '') + url
      if scheme:
      url = scheme + ':' + url
      if query:
      url = url + '?' + query
      if fragment:
      url = url + '#' + fragment
      return _coerce_result(url)

      (The '//' special-casing seems to occur in this line here:
      if netloc or (scheme and scheme in uses_netloc and url[:2] != '//'):
      )

      And here is where the round-tripping is tested:

      ('file:///tmp/junk.txt',

      (Three initial leading slashes is tested, but not the problem case of four or more.)

    2. added
      stdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directory
      type-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error
      on Jul 30, 2018
    3. tirkarthi commented on Jul 30, 2018

      @tirkarthi
      Member

      This is an issue with Python 2 too which I hope can be fixed too. The original logic in the code was committed around 16 years back : bbc0568 and tests are also around 10 years old too.

      ➜ cpython git:(2bea771) ✗ ./python.exe
      Python 2.7.15+ (remotes/upstream/2.7:2bea771609, Jul 30 2018, 18:07:51)
      [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 7.0.2 (clang-700.1.81)] on darwin
      Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.

      >>
      ➜ cpython git:(2bea771) ✗ ./python.exe bpo-34276.py
      file://root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='root', path='/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file://root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: True

      file:///root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='/root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file:///root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: True

      file:////root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='//root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file://root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: False

      file://///root/a [SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='///root/a', query='', fragment='')]
      file:///root/a
      ROUNDTRIP: False

      Thanks

    4. tirkarthi commented on Jul 30, 2018

      @tirkarthi
      Member

      I just checked back the behavior on Perl's https://github.com/libwww-perl/URI/ . It seems to handle that along with other additional cases. Maybe some of the tests can be adopted from there for better coverage too (https://github.com/libwww-perl/URI/blob/master/t/split.t)

      $ cat bpo34276.pl
      use URI::Split qw(uri_split uri_join);

      sub print_url{
      my $uri = shift;
      print "original uri ", $uri, "\n";
      ($scheme, $auth, $path, $query, $frag) = uri_split($uri);
      $uri = uri_join($scheme, $auth, $path, $query, $frag);
      print "returned uri ", $uri, "\n";
      }

      print_url("file://root/a");
      print_url("file:///root/a");
      print_url("file:////root/a");
      print_url("file://///root/a");

      $ perl bpo34276.pl
      original uri file://root/a
      returned uri file://root/a
      original uri file:///root/a
      returned uri file:///root/a
      original uri file:////root/a
      returned uri file:////root/a
      original uri file://///root/a
      returned uri file://///root/a

      Thanks

    5. vadmium commented on Jul 30, 2018

      @vadmium
      Member

      This may be a very old regression (from 2002) caused by bpo-591713 and Mercurial rev. 554f975073a0. The original check for the double slash, added in 0d6bd391acd8, “escapes” a path beginning with a double slash by prefixing it with two more slashes (empty “netloc”). This should round-trip Chris’s problem URLs.

      I think the logic in “urlsplit” should always add the extra double slash for the netloc, regardless of path, at least if a scheme is present and it is registered in “uses_netloc”. This should fix Chris’s instance of the bug, since “file:” is registered. There is already a patch in bpo-1722348 which should do this (although it includes other changes as well).

      The double slash should also be escaped if no scheme is present. (The empty scheme string is already in “uses_netloc”.) This might satisfy bpo-23505.

      IMO it would be better to do the escaping by default, for all schemes unknown to “urllib”, and to blacklist specific schemes like “mailto:” instead. But that would be out of scope for a bug fix.

    6. cjerdonek commented on Jul 31, 2018

      @cjerdonek
      MemberAuthor

      Thanks for all the extra info. A couple more comments:

      1. I came across this issue when diagnosing the following pip issue ("pip install git+file://" not working for Windows UNC paths):
        pip install git+file:// doesn't work with Windows UNC paths pypa/pip#3783

      2. URLs of the form "file:////root" (with four or more leading slashes) are perhaps not valid URI's technically. See Section 3. "Syntax Components" of RFC 3986, where it says, "When authority [i.e. netloc] is not present, the path cannot begin with two slash characters ('//')":
        https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3

      However, I don't think that means Python shouldn't try to roundtrip it successfully. Also, git-clone is apparently okay with URLs of this form, and does the right thing with them.

    7. vadmium commented on Jul 31, 2018

      @vadmium
      Member

      I think your URLs are valid by RFC 3986. "When authority is not present" refers to URLs without the double-slash prefix, like the "urn:example:animal:ferret:nose". The RFC treats empty authority and no authority as different cases. If authority is present, the format for hier-part has to be

      "//" authority path-abempty

      Authority may be an empty string:

      authority = [userinfo "@"] host [":" port]
      host = IP-literal / IPv4address / reg-name
      reg-name = *(unreserved / pct-encoded / sub-delims)  ; May be empty

      Path-abempty may begin with two slashes if the first two segments are empty strings:

      path-abempty = *("/" segment)
      segment = *pchar ; May be empty

    8. cjerdonek commented on Jul 31, 2018

      @cjerdonek
      MemberAuthor

      The RFC treats empty authority and no authority as different cases.

      I'm not well-versed on this. But I guess this means urllib.parse doesn't support this distinction. For example:

        >>> urllib.parse.urlsplit('file:/foo')
        SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='/foo', query='', fragment='')
        >>> urllib.parse.urlsplit('file:///foo')
        SplitResult(scheme='file', netloc='', path='/foo', query='', fragment='')
        >>> urllib.parse.urlsplit('file:/foo') == \
            urllib.parse.urlsplit('file:///foo')
        True

      Both have authority / netloc equal to the empty string, even though in the first example the authority isn't present per your comment.

    9. vadmium commented on Jul 31, 2018

      @vadmium
      Member

      Yes urllib doesn’t distinguish a missing authority/netloc from an empty string. The same for the ?query and #fragment parts. There is bpo-22852 open about that.

    10. vladima commented on Sep 7, 2018

      vladimamannequin
      Mannequin

      file URI scheme is covered by RFC8089, specifically https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8089#appendix-E.3.2.

    11. transferred this issue fromon Apr 10, 2022
    12. serhiy-storchaka commented on Dec 29, 2023

      @serhiy-storchaka
      Member

      Initially the condition was added in f3963b1, specially to handle file: URLs starting with 4 slashes.

      f3963b1#diff-c272b33cfc076b56637b73ae6fecd13ca0b999883a0a48b16a5c564b24bdb4c3R115

             if netloc or (scheme in uses_netloc and url[:2] == '//'):

      But it was wrong for file: URLs starting with 3 slashes, so the condition was negated in 7dfb6e2 (bpo-591713/gh-36991).

      7dfb6e2#diff-c272b33cfc076b56637b73ae6fecd13ca0b999883a0a48b16a5c564b24bdb4c3R131

             if netloc or (scheme in uses_netloc and url[:2] != '//'):

      Since the first change was without tests, its initial purpose was lost.

      I believe that the right condition should be

          if netloc or (scheme and scheme in uses_netloc) or url[:2] == '//':

      Even if netloc is empty and scheme is empty or not requires a netloc, // should be added if the path starts with //, otherwise the first component of the part will be confused with a netlock when parse.

    13. vadmium commented on May 12, 2024

      @vadmium
      Member

      After seeing that the “mailto:” RFC 6068 says slashes (/) have to be encoded in e.g. mailto:%2F%2Flocal@domain, I agree with adding the extra double-slash (//) regardless of scheme. (Previously I believed mailto://local@domain to be valid for an address of //local@domain, but I take that back.)

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

    Metadata

    Metadata

    Assignees

    No one assigned

      Labels

      3.7 (EOL)end of life3.8 (EOL)end of life3.9 (EOL)end of lifestdlibStandard Library Python modules in the Lib/ directorytype-bugAn unexpected behavior, bug, or error

      Projects

      No projects

        Milestone

        No milestone

        Relationships

        None yet

        Development

        No branches or pull requests

        Issue actions