Abstract
Polycystic Ovary Syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder with complex diagnostic challenges due to symptom heterogeneity and limited clinical criteria. This study presents an AI-driven diagnostic framework integrating tabular deep learning, causal inference, and interpretability techniques to enhance PCOS diagnosis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to jointly leverage state-of-the-art tabular models—TabNet, FT-Transformer, and TabPFN—alongside heterogeneous ensemble methods in the context of PCOS diagnosis. Our approach achieves competitive performance, with the Bayesian Neural Network (BNN) attaining 93.83% accuracy on the test set and demonstrating better probability calibration (ECE = 0.02). Key contributions include a Causal-Neural Boosted Ensemble (CNBE) trained on causally significant features via a Causal-Gated Structural Regularization (CGSR) mechanism, and few-shot learning strategies for low-data adaptability. Interpretability is ensured through SHAP analysis and intrinsic attention mechanisms. Causal inference reveals clinically actionable insights, such as the strong causal influence of metabolic and lifestyle factors. The framework contributes to Trustworthy ML principles by providing transparency and uncertainty quantification, offering a foundation for future clinical decision support.










Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.
References
Arik SÖ, Pfister T (2021) TabNet: attentive interpretable tabular learning. Proc AAAI Conf Artif Intell 35(8):6679–6687. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v35i8.16826
Begum GS, Almashaikhi NAT, Albalushi MY, Alsalehi HM, Alazawi RS, Goud BKM, Dube R (2024) Prevalence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and its associated risk factors among medical students in two countries. Int J Environ Res Public Health 21(9):1165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph21091165
Chelliah BJ, Gahra SK, Senthilselvi A (2024) Enhancing PCOS prediction using machine learning and explainable AI. In: 2024 International conference on intelligent computing and sustainable innovations in Technology (IC-SIT). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC-SIT63503.2024.10862800
Christ JP, Cedars MI (2023) Current guidelines for diagnosing PCOS. Diagnostics (Basel) 13(6):1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061113
Çiçek İ, Küçükakçalı Z (2024) Global interpretation of machine learning models in predicting polycystic ovary syndrome with the explainable artificial intelligence method SHAP. Med Sci 13(3):568–574. https://doi.org/10.5455/medscience.2023.12.228
Cleveland Clinic (2023) Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diseases/8316-polycystic-ovary-syndrome-pcos
Conway GS, Honour JW, Jacobs HS (1989) Heterogeneity of the polycystic ovary syndrome: clinical, endocrine and ultrasound features in 556 patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxford) 30(4):459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2265.1989.tb00446.x
Dixit J, Rai A, Tandon P, Pandey D (2025) ASHA: Machine learning-based polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) detection and prediction system. In: 2025 1st International conference on AIML-applications for engineering & technology (ICAET). IEEE, pp 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAET63349.2025.10932292
Firdouse A, Kodipalli A (2024) Detection of PCOS leveraging machine learning and interpretation using explainable AI. In: 2024 First international conference for women in computing (InCoWoCo). IEEE, pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/InCoWoCo64194.2024.10863596
Ganie MA, Chowdhury S, Malhotra N et al (2024) Prevalence, phenotypes, and comorbidities of polycystic ovary syndrome among Indian women. Diabetes Endocrinol 7(10):e2440583. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40583
Gorishniy Y, Rubachev I, Khrulkov V, Babenko A (2021) Revisiting deep learning models for tabular data. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 34, pp 18932-18943. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.11959
Hollmann N, Müller S, Eggensperger K, Hutter F (2022) TabPFN: a transformer that solves small tabular classification problems in a second. arXiv: 2207.01848
Jabeen A, Yamini V, Amberina AR, Eshwar MD, Vadakedath S, Begum GS, Kandi V (2022) Polycystic ovarian syndrome: prevalence, predisposing factors, and awareness among adolescent and young girls of South India. Cureus 14(8):e27943. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.27943
Jagadeesan S, Marannan P (2025) Vector conversion based PCOS detection in data segmentation using multi-task learning by dynamic deep learning architecture. Biosci, Biotechnol Res Asia 22(1):209–222. https://doi.org/10.13005/bbra/3355
Liu B, Xia H, Zhang J, Hu Y, Wang Q (2025) Building personalized risk prediction models for polycystic ovary syndrome using machine learning techniques: a retrospective study. Curr Sci 5(2):1942–1955. https://doi.org/10.52845/CS/2025-5-2-54
Lujan ME, Chizen DR, Pierson RA (2008) Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: pitfalls and controversies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 30(8):671–679. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)32915-2
Mahesswari GU, Maheswari PU (2024) SmartScanPCOS: a feature-driven approach to cutting-edge prediction of polycystic ovary syndrome using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence. Heliyon 10(20):e39205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39205
NHS (2022) Polycystic ovary syndrome. https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/polycystic-ovary-syndrome-pcos/treatment/
Oliha FO, Martins KM, Okhuoya JO (2025) Leveraging machine learning models for predicting the likelihood of polycystic ovarian syndrome in women of reproductive age. FUDMA J Sci 9(1):323–332. https://doi.org/10.33003/fjs-2025-0901-3088
Panjwani B, Yadav J, Mohan V, Agarwal N, Agarwal S (2025) Optimized machine learning for the early detection of polycystic ovary syndrome in women. Sensors 25(4):1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25041166
Patil M (2023) The prevalence of PCOS in South Asia. Fertil Reprod 5(4):190. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2661318223740043
Patil PB, Rashmi M, Natesha BV, Shetty RD (2025) Explainable ensemble-based machine learning model for polycystic ovary syndrome detection using hybrid feature selection. Int J Inf Technol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41870-025-03044-4
Pillay O, Khan K, Ojha K (2024) Polycystic ovary syndrome in South Asians. Polycystic ovary syndrome: basic science to clinical advances across the lifespan. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-87932-3.00033-5
Smet M-E, McLennan A (2018) Rotterdam criteria, the end. Australas J Ultrasound Med 21(2):59–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajum.12096
Tong C, Wu Y, Zhuang Z, Yu Y (2025) A diagnostic model for polycystic ovary syndrome based on machine learning. Sci Rep 15(1):9821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92630-4
Upreti K, George J, Upreti S, Mahajan S (2025) Polycystic ovary syndrome diagnosis: the promise of artificial intelligence for improved clinical accuracy. Biomed Pharmacol J 18(1):353–372. https://doi.org/10.13005/bpj/3093
Wang CY, Pei D, Wang CK, Ke JC, Lee ST, Chu TW, Liang YJ (2025) Using machine learning to predict patients with polycystic ovary disease in Chinese women. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 64(1):68–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2024.09.019
Watson S (2023) Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): symptoms, causes, and treatment. Healthline. Edited by J. Bassham. Medically reviewed by A. Kallen, MD. https://www.healthline.com/health/polycystic-ovary-disease#bottom-line
World Health Organization (2025) Polycystic ovary syndrome. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/polycystic-ovary-syndrome
Funding
The study did not receive any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.S.H contributed to Conceptualization; Methodology; Software; Validation; Formal analysis; Investigation; Data curation; Visualization; Writing—original draft; Writing—review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hasan, K.S. Tabular deep neural networks and causal inference-based feature selection for PCOS diagnosis. Adv. in Comp. Int. 6, 6 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43674-026-00092-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Version of record:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43674-026-00092-6

