Visitar URL original
snappy-java 1.1.9.0 Can't work with Java 8 · Issue #389 · xerial/snappy-java · GitHub
Skip to content

snappy-java 1.1.9.0 Can't work with Java 8 #389

Closed

Description

@LuciferYang

I wrote a simple demo to reproduce this issue, the demo is in https://github.com/LuciferYang/snappy-java-test

The test code as follows:

@Test
 public void testCompress() throws IOException {
        ByteBuffer src = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(1024);
        src.put("hello world".getBytes());
        src.flip();
        ByteBuffer dest = ByteBuffer.allocateDirect(1024);
        int maxCompressedLen = Snappy.compress(src, dest);
        Assert.assertEquals(maxCompressedLen, 13);
    }

run the above case with zulu 8u352

java -version
openjdk version "1.8.0_352"
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (Zulu 8.66.0.15-CA-macos-aarch64) (build 1.8.0_352-b08)
OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (Zulu 8.66.0.15-CA-macos-aarch64) (build 25.352-b08, mixed mode)

run mvn clean test -Dsnappy-java.version=1.1.8.4 with Java 8 will pass

run mvn clean test -Dsnappy-java.version=1.1.9.0 with Java 8 will failed as follows:

-------------------------------------------------------
 T E S T S
-------------------------------------------------------
Running org.example.SnappyJavaTest
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.374 sec <<< FAILURE!
testCompress(org.example.SnappyJavaTest)  Time elapsed: 0.345 sec  <<< ERROR!
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: java.nio.ByteBuffer.limit(I)Ljava/nio/ByteBuffer;
	at org.xerial.snappy.Snappy.compress(Snappy.java:157)
	at org.example.SnappyJavaTest.testCompress(SnappyJavaTest.java:17)

run mvn clean test -Dsnappy-java.version=1.1.9.0 with Java 11 will pass

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]1.1.9.0 Can't work with Java 8[/-] [+]snappy-java 1.1.9.0 Can't work with Java 8[/+] on Jan 31, 2023
  2. LuciferYang commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @LuciferYang
    Author

    cc @dongjoon-hyun I create a issue for snappy-java 1.1.9.0 run with Java 8

    I'm not sure whether this is unexpected. Let's wait for @xerial

  3. xerial commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @xerial
    Owner

    Ok. It hits a well-known issue of ByteBuffer incompatibility between JDK8 and later #390

  4. xerial commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @xerial
    Owner
  5. LuciferYang commented on Jan 31, 2023

    @LuciferYang
    Author

    Thanks @xerial

  6. dongjoon-hyun commented on Feb 1, 2023

    @dongjoon-hyun

    Thank you, @LuciferYang and @xerial .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions