Visitar URL original
Questions Viewers Have About 'You Can See Everything'

    “What Is The Nature Of Truth?”: 16 Questions I (And The Rest Of The Internet) Have After Watching “You Can See Everything”

    Constantly talking and questioning You Can See Everything has officially become my personality now.

    Sara De Ledesma
    by Sara De LedesmaBuzzFeedBuzzFeed Staff

    As a full-time writer at BuzzFeed Canada, I cover all things pop culture and food.

    Nathan Fielder's new documentary, You Can See Everything, has recently hit theatres and is taking over everyone's feed. The film has already brought in more than $15 million US at the box office and is receiving extremely positive reviews on Rotten Tomatoes and Letterboxd.

    Two people in conversation, one smiling, captured in a close-up shot from a film or TV show scene
    A24 / Everett Collection

    And after seeing it in theaters myself, let me tell you, this movie was NOTHING like anything I've ever seen before. The twists and turns it took me on felt like I was strapped in for a three-hour-long roller coaster, but I was completely enthralled for every single minute of it.

    Woman laughs with a child in a cozy kitchen, with an adult in the background
    A24 / Everett Collection

    🚨 SPOILERS AHEAD! 🚨

    That being said, I walked out with SO many questions. Was Elizabeth's previous relationship extremely similar? Is Elizabeth both a victim and guilty at the same time? And perhaps the most important question: who's on first?

    A person wearing headphones is engaged in conversation with another, focused intently
    A24 / Everett Collection

    I'm clearly not the only one still trying to make sense of it all. From hilarious observations to deeper theories about the film, here are 16 of the best reactions to You Can See Everything:

    1. Perhaps the most shocking scene in the film is when Billy showers, and this viewer is still wondering why it even happened in the first place:

    Tweet discusses a moment of nudity in the movie "You Can See Everything," speculating it was meant to humiliate the person involved
    @chuck_says_yes on X / Via x.com

    2. Nathan brings up Abbott and Costello's famous "Who's on First?" routine in the film, and this screenshot of Elizabeth Holmes' trial transcript shows just how absurd and similar these exchanges were:

    Summary of a Twitter post with a screenshot of a humorous Abbott and Costello-style exchange in a trial transcript related to Elizabeth Holmes
    @AnnaBower on X / Via x.com

    3. This viewer wanting to know why journalists aren't asking Nathan Fielder about the true meaning behind the film's title:

    Tweet questioning why journalists aren't asking Nathan Fielder about the complexities and meanings of a movie
    @dicknsn on X / Via x.com

    4. This viewer's reaction that perfectly represents the realization that hits once you get to a *certain* part of the film:

    A person in a crowded setting smiles slightly, wearing a striped vest over a shirt. The caption jokes about predicting a film's revealing scene
    @michaelcollado on X / Via x.com

    5. After Elizabeth and Nathan's conversation about whether her machine can do what it's supposed to, the film's title takes on a whole new meaning for this viewer:

    Tweet by user discussing how the title of "You Can See Everything" gains meaning from early film discussions on the word "can."
    @Caol_MacCormaic on X / Via x.com

    6. This viewer who came to an uncomfortable realization about the movie's most memorable question:

    Tweet by @coolestdudeyet: "You Can See Everything exposes an uncomfortable truth: we have no idea who's on first. Never did."
    @coolestdudeyet on X / Via x.com

    7. This photo that perfectly captures how everyone reacted to an *unexpected* moment in the film:

    Illustration of a person leaning forward intensely on a chair, with an arrow showing a more relaxed position. Tweet text: "There was a part in You Can See Everything where everyone in our packed theater did this."
    @gaporwave on X / Via x.com

    8. When Liz's father lightly touches on her history with relationships and assault, this viewer thinks it's the key to understanding her and the documentary as a whole:

    Tweet discussing a crucial line by Liz's father in a film, highlighting its significance to the plot and character understanding
    @hgtvdeathdrive on X / Via x.com

    9. The film may have been set just 34 days before Holmes' imprisonment, but this viewer points out an important detail about her real-life circumstances:

    Tweet by user discussing that Holmes was 1 month postpartum while filming and preparing for a decade in prison
    @jillgun on X / Via x.com

    10. This viewer questioning truth, language, and meaning as a whole after watching:

    Tweet discussing the nature of truth, language, and meaning, and pondering the responsibilities of journalists and actors
    @jeffisrael25 on X / Via x.com

    11. Trying to explain You Can See Everything to someone who hasn't seen it yet is an entire challenge of its own, and this viewer's reaction says it all:

    A person in a serious scene from a TV show or movie, looking at the camera with an oxygen tube in their nose. Tweet text jokes about reactions
    @500crabs on X / Via x.com

    12. This viewer questioning the film's biggest lesson:

    Tweet by gabby_frost: "The most important takeaway is to question vague wording."
    @gabby_frost on X / Via x.com

    13. This viewer was blown away by the movie, but was left with plenty to think about:

    Tweet by Nora: "You Can See Everything is genuinely astonishing, thrilling, terrifying, and so deeply sad. Left with harsh realities and unanswered questions."
    @shcmoraaa on X / Via x.com

    14. This viewer, who's still in disbelief over Billy saying Elizabeth looked "healthy" after her time in prison and no longer being postpartum:

    Tweet expressing disbelief over the evilness of a statement in the documentary "You Can See Everything."
    @snaiImaiI on X / Via x.com

    15. The film's structure is anything but straightforward, and this viewer is pointing it out very accurately:

    Tweet comparing the structure of "You Can See Everything" to a documentary on Elizabeth Holmes, then one with Nathan Fielder
    @Yngkvn on X / Via x.com

    16. This viewer recalling the Charlie Kirk name drops in the film, which clearly left an impression:

    Tweet praising a film for an unexpected plot twist that caused a strong audience reaction
    @canteverdie on X / Via x.com

    Have you gotten a chance to see the movie? Let us know all your thoughts and theories in the comments!

    I have so much more to share. Let's discuss it together. 💬 💬

    Comments