Repository navigation
Conversation
Co-authored-by: OpenCode Agent <agent@gsa.gov>
wz-gsa
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Adversarial draft review at eb8af75c90f310582a823446516fb8441e14b99e: this skill correctly reserves final categorization for authorized officials and keeps evidence sanitized, but High-Water-Mark Check and Procedure 4 present N/A < Low < Moderate < High and system objective impact = maximum final impact across applicable information types as the entire FIPS 199 computation. FIPS 199 also requires considering impacts to the system itself/mission service, not only enumerated information types; a system that handles only low-impact data but whose unavailable function has a moderate mission impact would be incorrectly reported Low. Amend the check to incorporate system/service impact scenarios and applicable agency tailoring before deriving the per-objective system result; supply a sanitized counterexample or test case. Keep the calculation clearly provisional and human-approved. The PR is still draft, and the checklist says human security review/label remains pending. Static review only; AI-assisted (OpenCode).
Summary
Adds one experimental security skill that reviews draft FIPS 199 categorization records for information-type coverage, CIA rationale, tailoring traceability, and reproducible high-water-mark calculations. It does not approve a categorization, boundary, or authorization decision.
Eligibility & Accountability
AI Assistance Disclosure
OpenCode drafted a public-safe skill from the cited public standards and regenerated repository indexes.
Pattern Information
Pattern ID:
fips-199-categorizationPattern Type:
skillStatus:
experimentalOwners:
@JJedinyTesting
Safety Checklist
Security Skill Checklist
needs-human-reviewlabel applied and human security review requested.Public Source Intake
Validation Results
Additional Context
This PR deliberately adds one focused, read-only review skill. It does not include agency workflows, source assessment artifacts, or final-determination logic.