Provoking thought, if there was a battle, conflict, war etc ... whose side would you want me on? Yours or the opposition? 🤔
In defense of the US Constitution, pursuant to Art. VI, cl. 2, and the 1st amendment, in accordance with the rights and duties demanded by Paragraph 2, Declaration of Independence (U.S. 1776); and in self defense against the unlawful incursion and deprivation of rights; i.e., "anti-DEI" without first being afforded due process by a prima facie and per se illegitimate government; i.e., 2024 election being nationally interfered with to exclude me and fraudulently certified in violation of the Constitution, including violating the appropriations clause.
Right here, in this section, is one location where my deadman's switch / AI / automation will promulgate for dissemination my belief / opinion of how anyone (Canada, France, Spain, NGOs, and even individuals) can successfully abolish the United States government; 1 rather than "cats"2, 3. Damnatio memoriae. Among other websites and likely social media accounts of mine.
History repeats when it is forgotten. As more lawful remedies abdicate and abandon their duties and oaths, it is poised to happen 😔.
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.” The Declaration of Independence para. 2 (U.S. 1776)
For approximately a year, "elected officials" in all 50 states and in the federal government have conspired and colluded to rig the 2024 US Presidential election against the entire United States.
Violating a number of laws, including, by interfering in the United States and its citizens having a fair & free election, two of your federally protected activities, 18 U.S.C. § 245(b)(1)(B), (E) have been knowingly and intentionally violated. Worse, no one was afforded due process as required by law which then violated the equal protection rights. Making the 2024 US Presidential election and everything arising from it, "Fruit of the poisonous tree".
The evidence is linked in these files on this page; and is also mirrored on Google drive and Proton drive.
Imposed eligibility criteria that conflicts with Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of the US Constitution, which is preempted / precluded in accordance with Article VI, Clause 2 of the US Constitution (the “Supremacy Clause”). Eligibility criteria that is designed to screen out individuals with disabilities, 42 U.S.C. § 12182(b)(2)(A)(i). Also making the United States and these States unequal/unfair employers. Promulgated by Trump v. Anderson, No. 23-719, 601 U.S. (2024), “It would be incongruous to read this particular Amendment as granting the States the power — silently no less — to disqualify a candidate for federal office,” establishes: (1) States lack the power to disqualify a candidate for federal office and, (2) that not including a candidate on the ballot, even for a primary would be disqualifying the candidate. Constituting violations of: 18 U.S.C. § 595, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241-242, and of Article 1, section 1 to the US Constitution; “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
- 09-15-2025: Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations
- 09-05-2025: Motion for reconsideration
- 09-02-2025: US Dist. "Court" Motion for Partial Summary Judgment
- 08-22-2025:
- Apprised "Superior 'Court'" of their criminal conduct
- Day 204 "Courts" still remain per se open whilst remaining functionally closed to constitutional enforcement. "Superior 'Court'" still refuses to adjudicate my emergency ex parte TRO from 07-30-2025, neither denied or approved; they want to deny it but lack the authority 😂. US District "Court" still hasn't ruled on my emergency motion from 07-24-2025.
- 08-16-2025:
- Mathematical certainty of Treason; November 5, 2024 😂
- Day 198 "Courts" still remain per se open whilst remaining functionally closed to constitutional enforcement. "Superior 'Court'" still refuses to adjudicate my emergency ex parte TRO from 07-30-2025, neither denied or approved; they want to deny it but lack the authority 😂. US District "Court" still hasn't ruled on my emergency motion from 07-24-2025.
- Military apprised of Constitutional crisis via social media
- 08-13-2025: Military apprised via web portals and additional email addresses, 07/24/2025's "Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance" and Emergency motion
- 08-11-2025: Military apprised, hand delivered 07/24/2025's "Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance" and Emergency motion
- 08-01-2025: Day 183 of the "judiciary" being per se open whilst functionally closed to constitutional enforcement. The one condition of their employment 🤦🏿♂️. Malachi 2:2, Malachi 4:1, Proverbs 1:26-27 for Jeremiah 25:33 😔
- 07-31-2025:
- Another day without mandatory Constitutional adjudication for an Ex parte TRO, as the "Court" still seeks the means to their end, neither a denial or approval.
- Another day looking into more of the judiciary, case precedent, and preparing different lawsuits to rectify the judiciary's treasonous acts from its genesis. "Mathew 'Matt Tyler' Tyler ad portas!" or simply, "Matt Tyler!"
- 07-30-2025: A new, different lawsuit that is related filed in "Superior 'Court'," including a motion for an emergency ex parte TRO to be adjudicated on 07-30-2025 @ 16:00. I was told on 07-30-2025 @ approximately 15:50 that my TRO will be denied, the "Court" just doesn't know how it's going to justify the denial. Denial prior to justification seems like a prejudice / bias or something to me, the "Court" knew how it was going to rule before it knew why it was going to rule that way; ends justifying the means much? More evidence of the collapse of the judiciary, that the judiciary is per se "open," just functionally closed to mandatory constitutional enforcement for a different, third, judiciary; first being US District "Court," then Ninth Circuit of Appeals, and now a State level "Superior 'Court'".
- 07-24-2025:
- US Dist. Court Emergency motion [USPS: 9505513376015206134921]
- US Military Authorization for Restoration of Constitutional Governance [Military apprised: Emailed 07/24/2025. USPS Delivery ETA, 07/30/2025. Hand delivered, 08/11/2025. Submitted through web portals and additional emails, 08/13/2025]
- 07-02-2025: Ninth Circuit: Emergency motion for ultra vires acts [Emailed & refusual without authority cited upon request, 07/02/2025. Hand delivered, 07/03/2025. Denied, 07/22/2025]
- 06-17-2025:
- 06-04-2025:
- 05-20-2025: Motion seeking to introduce evidence of Congressional knowledge of aid and comfort to our enemies [USPS 9505513376025140496511]
- 05-19-2025: Motion objecting to ruling refusing relief to Plaintiff whilst providing the same relief to Defendants, authority of unrefuted March 27th objection [USPS 9505515485565135598802]
- 05-17-2025: Re-submitted petition for writ of prohibition, conforming to Circuit Rule 21-2 [Ninth Circuit of Appeals, USPS 9505515485565135598826]
- 05-12-2025: Amended complaint, naming US Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota and Ninth Circuit of Appeals as defendants / co-conspirators [USPS 9505515485565129597538]
- 04-28-2025: Petition for writ of prohibition and temporary restraining order (Chief Judge, Ninth Circuit of Appeals [USPS 9505506703165116770800])
- 04-18-2025: Petition for writ of prohibition and temporary restraining order (Chief Judge, US District Court, EDCA)
- 04-16-2025: Motion establishing personal jurisdiction in California
- 03-27-2025:
- 03-19-2025: Directing US District Judges around the entire country to initiate criminal prosecution in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 1987
- 03-17-2025:
US District Court, Eastern District for California
Mathew Tyler
Plaintiff
vs.
118TH US CONGRESS;
US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, et al.;
US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL.;
BENJAMIN C. MIZER, ET SEQ., IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS PRINCIPAL DEPUTY ASSOCIATE ATTORNEY GENERAL, US DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE;
CALIFORNIA ATTORNEY GENERAL;
SHIRLEY WEBER, in her official capacity as California Secretary OF STATE;
FIONA MA, in her official capacity as California State TREASURER;
JAMES GALLAGHER, IN OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CA. ASSEMBLYMAN;
WASHINGTON US ATTORNEY / DOJ;
UTAH LT. GOVERNOR;
UTAH ATTORNEY GENERAL;
NEW HAMPSHIRE DOJ;
RHODE ISLAND EEOC;
DOES 1-50 (Secretaries of State for all 50 states)
Defendants
Quick links: Amended complaint | Summary Judgment | Initial complaint
Discovery: Google drive, Proton drive, Github
Discovery ISO file: Google Drive, Proton Drive -- github has a 25mb file limit
Easily shareable via: https://tylerpresident.com
Github directly via https://FakeGov.com
Short URLs, https://google.fakegov.com, https://proton.fakegov.com, and https://github.fakegov.com