Thank you for contributing to PlasmaPy! The project's future depends deeply on contributors like you, so we deeply appreciate it! 🌱 The following checklist will be used by the code reviewer to help guide the code review process.

• Overall
  • Does the PR do what it intends to do?
  • Except for very minor changes, is a changelog entry included and consistent with the changelog guide?
  • Are the continuous integration checks passing? (Most linter problems can be automagically fixed by commenting on this PR with pre-commit.ci autofix.)
• Code
  • Is new/updated code understandable and consistent with the coding guide?
  • Are there ways to greatly simplify the implementation?
  • Are there any large functions that should be split up into shorter functions?
• Tests
  • Are tests added/updated as required, and consistent with the testing guide?
  • Are the tests understandable?
  • Do the tests cover all important cases?
• Docs
  • Are docs added/updated as required, and consistent with the doc guide?
  • Are the docs understandable?
  • Do the docs show up correctly in the preview, including Jupyter notebooks?

Codecov Report

Base: 98.12% // Head: 98.13% // Increases project coverage by +0.00% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (a2108fb) compared to base (19075c9).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1732   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.12%   98.13%           
=======================================
  Files          87       87           
  Lines        8125     8134    +9     
=======================================
+ Hits         7973     7982    +9     
  Misses        152      152           

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Looks good in general! One question - isn't there anything we should be worrying about from a deprecation standpoint here? Are all the functions backwards compatible?

That is indeed an important question! Overall this would be an expansion of functionality so that CustomParticle and ParticleList instances should now be able to work with most of these functions (though we still very much need to add tests to make sure that there are no incompatibilities). There was one difference in the exception being raised in test_quantum.py but otherwise there weren't any substantive changes to tests. It's still possible that there will be different exceptions raised for some cases, though those would be limited to probably rare cases that we're not testing.

Oh, and thank you for the review!