Thank you for contributing to PlasmaPy! The project's future depends deeply on contributors like you, so we deeply appreciate it! 🌱 The following checklist will be used by the code reviewer to help guide the code review process.

• Overall
  • Does the PR do what it intends to do?
  • Except for very minor changes, is a changelog entry included and consistent with the changelog guide?
  • Are the continuous integration checks passing? (Most linter problems can be automagically fixed by commenting on this PR with pre-commit.ci autofix.)
• Code
  • Is new/updated code understandable and consistent with the coding guide?
  • Are there ways to greatly simplify the implementation?
  • Are there any large functions that should be split up into shorter functions?
• Tests
  • Are tests added/updated as required, and consistent with the testing guide?
  • Are the tests understandable?
  • Do the tests cover all important cases?
• Docs
  • Are docs added/updated as required, and consistent with the doc guide?
  • Are the docs understandable?
  • Do the docs show up correctly in the preview, including Jupyter notebooks?

Codecov Report

Base: 98.33% // Head: 98.33% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (a606133) compared to base (5eda6f1).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1846   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.33%   98.33%           
=======================================
  Files          95       95           
  Lines        8343     8343           
=======================================
  Hits         8204     8204           
  Misses        139      139           

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.