Visitar URL original
network: use calling account instead of network owner for destroy context by weizhouapache · Pull Request #14346 · apache/cloudstack · GitHub
Skip to content

network: use calling account instead of network owner for destroy context #14346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
weizhouapache wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 4.22
Choose a base branch
from
Open

network: use calling account instead of network owner for destroy context #14346

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .../main/java/com/cloud/kubernetes/cluster/actionworkers/KubernetesClusterDestroyWorker.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ private void destroyKubernetesClusterNetwork() throws ManagementServerException
if (network != null && network.getRemoved() == null) {
Account owner = accountManager.getAccount(network.getAccountId());
User callerUser = accountManager.getActiveUser(CallContext.current().getCallingUserId());
ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, owner);
ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, CallContext.current().getCallingAccount());
releaseASNumber(kubernetesCluster.getZoneId(), kubernetesCluster.getNetworkId());
boolean networkDestroyed = networkMgr.destroyNetwork(kubernetesCluster.getNetworkId(), context, true);
if (!networkDestroyed) {
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion server/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/NetworkServiceImpl.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2924,7 +2924,7 @@ public boolean deleteNetwork(long networkId, boolean forced) {
}

User callerUser = _accountMgr.getActiveUser(CallContext.current().getCallingUserId());
ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, owner);
ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, caller);

return _networkMgr.destroyNetwork(networkId, context, forced);
}
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion server/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/vpc/VpcManagerImpl.java
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2851,7 +2851,7 @@ protected boolean deletePrivateGatewayFromTheDB(final PrivateGateway gateway) {
if (deleteNetworkFinal) {
final User callerUser = _accountMgr.getActiveUser(CallContext.current().getCallingUserId());
final Account owner = _accountMgr.getAccount(Account.ACCOUNT_ID_SYSTEM);
final ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, owner);
final ReservationContext context = new ReservationContextImpl(null, null, callerUser, CallContext.current().getCallingAccount());

@Damans227 Damans227 Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

any reason to change this one too? it already used the system account so it never hit the disabled account problem, and now a normal user deleting the gateway could fail the permission checks

_ntwkMgr.destroyNetwork(networkId, context, false);
logger.debug("Deleted private network {}", network);
}
Expand Down
Loading