Visitar URL original
Add mise dotnet config by timabell · Pull Request #854 · dotnet-outdated/dotnet-outdated · GitHub
Skip to content

Add mise dotnet config - #854

Closed
timabell wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet-outdated:masterfrom
timabell:set-mise-version
Closed

timabell wants to merge 2 commits into
dotnet-outdated:masterfrom
timabell:set-mise-version

Conversation

@timabell

@timabell timabell commented Nov 12, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

For convenience downloading/installing/pinning dotnet sdk for local dev

Not sure if you'd welcome this, I find this useful for setting up dotnet on dev machines and making sure I can easily get the right version for a project.

https://mise.jdx.dev/dev-tools/backends/dotnet.html

timabell and others added 2 commits November 12, 2026 17:40
For convenience downloading/installing/pinning dotnet sdk for local dev

https://mise.jdx.dev/dev-tools/backends/dotnet.html
The test project targets net8.0, net9.0 and net11.0, but the mise config
installed only the 11.0 SDK, so the net9.0 tests couldn't start:
"You must install or update .NET to run this application ... Framework:
'Microsoft.NETCore.App', version '9.0.0'". Running the tests needs only
the runtimes, not their SDKs, so install those alongside the SDK.

mise needs exact runtime versions; these are the latest 8.0 and 9.0
releases.
  https://mise.jdx.dev/lang/dotnet.html

mise doesn't install new tool versions on its own: after checking this
out, run `mise install` (then `mise exec -- dotnet --list-runtimes`
should list 8.0.34 and 9.0.23), or the net9.0 tests still fail to start.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@slang25

slang25 commented Nov 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey @timabell , this looks cool, I'm glad you put it on my radar, but it's not something I'l looking to adopt. But thanks nonetheless

@slang25 slang25 closed this Nov 13, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants