Visitar URL original
CPP: PAM Authorization Bypass · Pull Request #8775 · github/codeql · GitHub
Skip to content
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Next Next commit
CPP: PAM Authorization Bypass
This PR is similar to my other PRs for
[Python](#8595) and
[Golang](github/codeql-go#709).

This PR aims to detect instances were an initiated PAM Transaction invokes the `pam_authenticate` method but does not invoke a call to the pam_acct_mgmt` method. This is bad as a call to `pam_authenticate` only verifies the users credentials. It does not check if the user account is still is a valid state.

If only a call to `pam_authenticate` is used to verify the user, a user with an expired account password would still be able to login. This can be prevented by calling the `pam_acct_mgmt` function after a `pam_authenticate` function.
  • Loading branch information
Porcupiney Hairs
Porcupiney Hairs committed Apr 19, 2022
commit 85c751cb7fc44f2d993c109b5b94f0a17265ae78
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
<!DOCTYPE qhelp PUBLIC "-//Semmle//qhelp//EN" "qhelp.dtd">
<qhelp>
<overview>
<p>
Using only a call to
<code>pam_authenticate</code>
to check the validity of a login can lead to authorization bypass vulnerabilities.
</p>
<p>
A
<code>pam_authenticate</code>
only verifies the credentials of a user. It does not check if a user has an appropriate authorization to actually login. This means a user with a expired login or a password can still access the system.
</p>

</overview>

<recommendation>
<p>
A call to
<code>pam_authenticate</code>
should be followed by a call to
<code>pam_acct_mgmt</code>
to check if a user is allowed to login.
</p>
</recommendation>

<example>
<p>
In the following example, the code only checks the credentials of a user. Hence, in this case, a user expired with expired creds can still login. This can be verified by creating a new user account, expiring it with
<code>chage -E0 `username` </code>
and then trying to log in.
</p>
<sample src="PamAuthorizationBad.c" />
Comment thread
This conversation was marked as resolved.
Resolved

<p>
This can be avoided by calling
<code>pam_acct_mgmt</code>
call to verify access as has been done in the snippet shown below.
</p>
<sample src="PamAuthorizationGood.c" />
Comment thread
This conversation was marked as resolved.
Resolved
</example>

<references>
<li>
Man-Page:
<a href="https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man3/pam_acct_mgmt.3.html">pam_acct_mgmt</a>
</li>
</references>
</qhelp>
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
/**
* @name PAM Authorization bypass
* @description Only using `pam_authenticate` call to authenticate users can lead to authorization vulnerabilities.
* @kind problem
* @problem.severity error
* @id cpp/pam-auth-bypass
* @tags security
* external/cwe/cwe-285
*/
import cpp
import semmle.code.cpp.dataflow.DataFlow
import semmle.code.cpp.valuenumbering.GlobalValueNumbering

private class PamAuthCall extends FunctionCall {
PamAuthCall() {
exists(Function f | f.hasName("pam_authenticate") | f.getACallToThisFunction() = this)
}
}

private class PamActMgmtCall extends FunctionCall {
PamActMgmtCall() {
exists(Function f | f.hasName("pam_acct_mgmt") | f.getACallToThisFunction() = this)
}
}

from PamAuthCall pa, Expr handle
where
pa.getArgument(0) = handle and
not exists(PamActMgmtCall pac |
globalValueNumber(handle) = globalValueNumber(pac.getArgument(0)) or
DataFlow::localExprFlow(handle, pac.getArgument(0))
)
select pa, "This PAM authentication call may be lead to an authorization bypass."
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
bool PamAuthGood(const std::string &username_in,
const std::string &password_in,
std::string &authenticated_username)
{

struct pam_handle *pamh = nullptr; /* pam session handle */

const char *username = username_in.c_str();
int err = pam_start("test", username,
0, &pamh);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
{
return false;
}

err = pam_authenticate(pamh, 0); // BAD
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;
return true;
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
bool PamAuthGood(const std::string &username_in,
const std::string &password_in,
std::string &authenticated_username)
{

struct pam_handle *pamh = nullptr; /* pam session handle */

const char *username = username_in.c_str();
int err = pam_start("test", username,
0, &pamh);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
{
return false;
}

err = pam_authenticate(pamh, 0);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;

err = pam_acct_mgmt(pamh, 0); // GOOD
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;
return true;
}
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
| test.cpp:29:11:29:26 | call to pam_authenticate | This PAM authentication call may be lead to an authorization bypass. |
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
experimental/Security/CWE/CWE-285/PamAuthorization.ql
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
#include "../../../../../library-tests/dataflow/taint-tests/stl.h"

using namespace std;

#define PAM_SUCCESS 1

typedef struct pam_handle
{
};
int pam_start(std::string servicename, std::string username, int a, struct pam_handle **);
int pam_authenticate(struct pam_handle *, int e);
int pam_acct_mgmt(struct pam_handle *, int e);

bool PamAuthBad(const std::string &username_in,
const std::string &password_in,
std::string &authenticated_username)
{

struct pam_handle *pamh = nullptr; /* pam session handle */

const char *username = username_in.c_str();
int err = pam_start("test", username,
0, &pamh);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
{
return false;
}

err = pam_authenticate(pamh, 0);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;

return true;
}

bool PamAuthGood(const std::string &username_in,
const std::string &password_in,
std::string &authenticated_username)
{

struct pam_handle *pamh = nullptr; /* pam session handle */

const char *username = username_in.c_str();
int err = pam_start("test", username,
0, &pamh);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
{
return false;
}

err = pam_authenticate(pamh, 0);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;

err = pam_acct_mgmt(pamh, 0);
if (err != PAM_SUCCESS)
return err;
return true;
}