Visitar URL original
Drop the ultra-flaky test for orphaned subscriptions. by tseaver · Pull Request #2215 · googleapis/google-cloud-python · GitHub
Skip to content

Drop the ultra-flaky test for orphaned subscriptions. - #2215

Merged
tseaver merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
tseaver:2080-pubsub-drop-flaky-orphan-test
Sep 2, 2016
Merged

Drop the ultra-flaky test for orphaned subscriptions.#2215
tseaver merged 1 commit into
googleapis:masterfrom
tseaver:2080-pubsub-drop-flaky-orphan-test

Conversation

@tseaver

@tseaver tseaver commented Aug 28, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See:
#2080 (comment)

Closes #2080.

@tseaver tseaver added api: pubsub Issues related to the Pub/Sub API. flaky labels Aug 28, 2016
@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Aug 28, 2016
@daspecster

daspecster commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

In #2080 (comment), you mentioned there are other tests that cover this case?

Otherwise LGTM. I agree we need to get the build green with as few logical gaps in test coverage as possible.

I wonder if we should have some kind of secondary set of system tests? It might be nice to track these kinds of issues for the upstream guys?

@tseaver

tseaver commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@daspecster Another option would be to mark the test with @unittest.expectedFailure.

@daspecster daspecster mentioned this pull request Aug 29, 2016
Merged
@dhermes

dhermes commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

See my comment on #2080. Let's hold off on merging this until we can get @tmatsuo to weigh in (or until a fixed time interval passes not hearing from him)

@tseaver

tseaver commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@dhermes WDYT of leaving it in place, but decorating it with @unittest.expected_failure? The back-end folks could use to to investigate, and meanwhile we would be green.

@dhermes

dhermes commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Seems mostly OK. But an issue needs to be filed to follow up and fix it.

@tseaver

tseaver commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

#2080 would stay open if we followed that route: ideally, we would assign it to @tmatsuo.

@dhermes

dhermes commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

OK

@tseaver
Mark ultra-flaky 'orphan subscrpition' test as an expected failure.
27eec9d 
Allows our tests to go green while the back-end investigates.

Also, drop the ultra-flaky 'self.assertFalse(topic.exists())' in
'test_list_subscriptions'.  It is redundant (names are unique), and dropping
it lets the test pass normally.

Toward #2080, #2111.
@tseaver

tseaver commented Aug 29, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

I just backed out the "delete the test" change and marked it with unittest.expectedFailure.

I also dropped the self.assertFalse(topic.exists()) (see #2111).

dhermes
dhermes reviewed Aug 30, 2016
View reviewed changes
Comment thread system_tests/pubsub.py
def test_list_subscriptions(self):
TOPIC_NAME = 'list-sub' + unique_resource_id('-')
topic = Config.CLIENT.topic(TOPIC_NAME)
self.assertFalse(retry_unavailable(topic.exists)())

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

This comment was marked as spam.

Sign in to view

@dhermes

dhermes commented Sep 1, 2016

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Go ahead and merge

@tseaver
tseaver merged commit efe359a into googleapis:master Sep 2, 2016
@tseaver
tseaver deleted the 2080-pubsub-drop-flaky-orphan-test branch September 2, 2016 12:50
@tseaver tseaver mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2016
Closed
@dhermes dhermes mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2016
Merged
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 22, 2023
@dizcology @danoscarmike
update streaming samples [(#2215)](GoogleCloudPlatform/python-docs-sa…
b686c70 
…mples#2215)
parthea added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2025
@parthea
feat: Add support for Python 3.13 (#2215)
866025a
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2026
@renovate-bot
chore(deps): update dependency google-api-core to v2.25.1 (#2215)
2e440bd
parthea pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 1, 2026
@TrevorBergeron
feat: Polars engine supports std, var (#2215)
78870d8
@parthea parthea mentioned this pull request Sep 8, 2026
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

api: pubsub Issues related to the Pub/Sub API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@tseaver @daspecster @dhermes @googlebot