Visitar URL original
Make PV tests work on kubemark clusters · Issue #803 · kubernetes/perf-tests · GitHub
Skip to content

Make PV tests work on kubemark clusters #803

Open

Description

@mm4tt

Enabling PVs in the load test failed the kubemark presubmit because scheduler failed to schedule pods with PVs

Unable to schedule test-y6u59n-1/small-statefulset-0-0: no fit: 0/101 nodes are available: 1 node(s) were unschedulable, 100 node(s) had volume node affinity conflict.; waiting

In order to make it work on kubemark we'll most likely have to change a few places in the code (or ensure they already work this way) so they're faking operations related to attaching and mounting PDs in kubemark

  • Attach Detach Controller
  • HollowKubelet
  • Scheduler
  • ?

Ref. #704

Activity

  1. changed the title [-]Make PV test work on kubemark clusters[/-] [+]Make PV tests work on kubemark clusters[/+] on Sep 18, 2019
  2. added
    help wantedDenotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.
    on Sep 18, 2019
  3. added a commit that references this issue on Sep 18, 2019
  4. mm4tt commented on Sep 18, 2019

    @mm4tt
    ContributorAuthor

    /good-first-issue

  5. k8s-ci-robot commented on Sep 18, 2019

    @k8s-ci-robot
    Contributor

    @mm4tt:
    This request has been marked as suitable for new contributors.

    Please ensure the request meets the requirements listed here.

    If this request no longer meets these requirements, the label can be removed
    by commenting with the /remove-good-first-issue command.

    Details

    In response to this:

    /good-first-issue

    Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

  6. added
    good first issueDenotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.
    on Sep 18, 2019
  7. jukie commented on Oct 3, 2019

    @jukie

    I'd like to pick this up, where would I begin?

  8. mm4tt commented on Oct 3, 2019

    @mm4tt
    ContributorAuthor

    Hey, @jukie, that's great to hear!

    This one is a bit more complicated, I'll need to think about it more and come up with a more concrete list of steps. Unfortunately, I won't have time to do it until ~mid next week.
    In the meantime, feel free to pick another issue from the help wanted list. I think #595 is relatively simple and will get you through all the prep work required to start contributing to kubernetes (forking repos, signing CLA, etc.).

  9. fejta-bot commented on Jan 1, 2020

    @fejta-bot

    Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
    Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
    Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

    If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

    Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
    /lifecycle stale

  10. added
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Jan 1, 2020
  11. wojtek-t commented on Jan 2, 2020

    @wojtek-t
    Member

    /remove-lifecycle stale

  12. removed
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Jan 2, 2020
  13. fejta-bot commented on Apr 1, 2020

    @fejta-bot

    Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
    Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
    Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

    If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

    Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
    /lifecycle stale

  14. added
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Apr 1, 2020
  15. mm4tt commented on Apr 1, 2020

    @mm4tt
    ContributorAuthor

    /remove-lifecycle stale

    We still want to do it...

  16. removed
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Apr 1, 2020
  17. fejta-bot commented on Jun 30, 2020

    @fejta-bot

    Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
    Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
    Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

    If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

    Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
    /lifecycle stale

  18. added
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Jun 30, 2020
  19. wojtek-t commented on Jun 30, 2020

    @wojtek-t
    Member

    /remove-lifecycle stale
    /lifecycle frozen

  20. added
    lifecycle/frozenIndicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
    and removed
    lifecycle/staleDenotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale.
    on Jun 30, 2020
  21. RafalKorepta commented on Aug 6, 2020

    @RafalKorepta
    Contributor

    /assign

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

Labels

area/clusterloadergood first issueDenotes an issue ready for a new contributor, according to the "help wanted" guidelines.help wantedDenotes an issue that needs help from a contributor. Must meet "help wanted" guidelines.lifecycle/frozenIndicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Type

No type

Projects

No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions