Visitar URL original
Skip 500 after completed POST response on closed writer by dharaneesh-sys · Pull Request #3653 · modelcontextprotocol/python-sdk · GitHub
Skip to content

Skip 500 after completed POST response on closed writer - #3653

Closed
dharaneesh-sys wants to merge 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
dharaneesh-sys:fix-3651-no-double-response
Closed

dharaneesh-sys wants to merge 1 commit into
modelcontextprotocol:mainfrom
dharaneesh-sys:fix-3651-no-double-response

Conversation

@dharaneesh-sys

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Fixes #3651

Notification POSTs send 202 Accepted before forwarding to the session writer. If the writer is closed, the resulting ClosedResourceError was answered with a second response (500), which Uvicorn rejects with RuntimeError: Unexpected ASGI message after completed. Track whether the POST response was already sent and, if so, log and drop instead of sending another response; also tolerate a closed writer when forwarding the error.

Assisted by AI (Muse Spark) with human review and verification — repro reviewed and run locally.

Test plan:

  • New regression test test_closed_writer_notification_post_sends_single_202 passes; fails without the fix with RuntimeError
  • pytest on streamable-HTTP suites: 206 passed
  • ruff check, ruff format --check, pyright clean on touched files

Notification POSTs send 202 Accepted before forwarding to the session writer. If the writer is closed, the resulting ClosedResourceError was answered with a second response (500), which Uvicorn rejects. Track whether the POST response was already sent and log-and-drop instead. Fixes modelcontextprotocol#3651.
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the missing-issue-link Auto-closed: PR needs a linked issue assigned to its author (see CONTRIBUTING.md) label Oct 7, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR has been closed automatically. This repo only keeps pull requests open when they come from a maintainer, or from a contributor a maintainer has assigned to the linked issue, and you aren't currently assigned to #3651.

If a maintainer assigns you to #3651, this PR reopens on its own and there's nothing more you need to do here. Assignment is a maintainer call based on capacity; comments that only ask to be assigned don't factor in. What does help is engaging on the issue itself by confirming the repro, explaining why it matters for your use case, or describing the approach you'd take.

You're welcome to keep pushing commits here (just avoid force-pushing, since GitHub can't reopen a rewritten branch), but that on its own won't get the PR reviewed or the issue assigned, and realistically most auto-closed PRs stay closed. There's no need to open a new PR either way.

CONTRIBUTING.md has the full reasoning, but in short:

  • We're a small team with very little capacity to review community PRs right now.
  • Many recent PRs are AI-generated with little human review, and reviewing one carefully still costs a maintainer as much time as it ever did. A well-described issue is usually more useful to us than the code.

Maintainers: reopen, remove missing-issue-link, or add bypass-issue-check to override.

@github-actions github-actions Bot closed this Oct 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

missing-issue-link Auto-closed: PR needs a linked issue assigned to its author (see CONTRIBUTING.md)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Streamable HTTP notification sends a second response when the session writer is closed

1 participant