Visitar URL original
Update branding and documentation consistency by ptr727 · Pull Request #13 · ptr727/ProjectTemplate · GitHub
Skip to content

Update branding and documentation consistency - #13

Merged
ptr727 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
readme2
Jan 15, 2026
Merged

ptr727 merged 2 commits into
developfrom
readme2

Conversation

@ptr727

@ptr727 ptr727 commented Jan 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Improve consistency in branding and documentation by correcting capitalization in Git configuration instructions and platform references.

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings January 15, 2026 20:10

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull request overview

This PR updates branding consistency in the README documentation by correcting the capitalization of technology names to match their official branding guidelines.

Changes:

  • Corrected "git" to "Git" (proper noun)
  • Corrected "MacOS" to "macOS" (Apple's official branding)

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
@ptr727
ptr727 merged commit e97a8fb into develop Jan 15, 2026
18 checks passed
@ptr727
ptr727 deleted the readme2 branch January 15, 2026 20:30
ptr727 added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2026
* Update workspace and README for improved setup instructions and extension recommendations

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>

* Update branding and documentation consistency (#13)

* Branding

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>

* Allow only squash merging

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>

---------

Signed-off-by: Pieter Viljoen <ptr727@users.noreply.github.com>
ptr727 added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2026
… Its Promotion (#4055)

## Summary

Reconciles the hub's record of HolidayLights with what its `main` holds
since ptr727/HolidayLights#17 promoted the 2025 and 2026 shows and the
fleet baseline. This is the registry step of a HolidayLights resync,
audit run `2026-11-11T00:50:25Z | hub 1397e30 | branch override
develop`.

- **`registry/repos.json`.** Deletes the `driftNote` saying the 2025 and
2026 show folders and the baseline (ptr727/HolidayLights#11, #13-#16)
wait on `develop` for a promotion. The audit flagged it as a note
asserting pending work.
- **`docs/reusable-workflows.md`.** Ticks HolidayLights in both the
merge-bot and the `validate-task.yml` rows, since its callers have
called each by pin since ptr727/HolidayLights#15.
- **`docs/eol-lf-rollout.md`.** Ticks HolidayLights as converted in
ptr727/HolidayLights#10, and records its 2026-10-24 reclassification to
`operational`.

## Verification

- `spec/validate.py` passes, and the registry parses.
- A read of HolidayLights `origin/main` confirms each claim: the
2021-2026 show folders, the carried instruction set, a
`test-pull-request.yml` calling `validate-task.yml` by pin, and `*
text=auto eol=lf` with `xlights_effectpresets.json` pinned CRLF.
- Recorded local strict review passes cover the head, and the
diff-scoped prose gate is clean.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)


<!-- This is an auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai
-->

<!-- coderabbit-ai-generated:v1 -->

## Summary by CodeRabbit

* **Documentation**
* Updated rollout guidance to reflect the repository’s LF line-ending
configuration and adoption of merge-bot and validation workflows.
  * Clarified that the effect presets file uses CRLF line endings.
* Removed an outdated note about show folders and fleet baseline files
awaiting promotion.

<!-- end of auto-generated comment: release notes by coderabbit.ai -->

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants