Visitar URL original
bpo-40528: Improve & clear a bunch of internal asdl thing by isidentical · Pull Request #19952 · python/cpython · GitHub
Skip to content

bpo-40528: Improve & clear a bunch of internal asdl thing #19952

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
pablogsal merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2020
Merged

bpo-40528: Improve & clear a bunch of internal asdl thing #19952

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
3590970
bpo-40528: Improve & clear a bunch of internal asdl thing
isidentical May 6, 2020
1dfdffb
dont use switch default
isidentical May 6, 2020
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions Include/asdl.h
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,9 +4,7 @@

typedef PyObject * identifier;
typedef PyObject * string;
typedef PyObject * bytes;
typedef PyObject * object;
typedef PyObject * singleton;
typedef PyObject * constant;

/* It would be nice if the code generated by asdl_c.py was completely
Expand Down
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion Lib/test/test_ast.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ def test_empty_yield_from(self):
empty_yield_from.body[0].body[0].value.value = None
with self.assertRaises(ValueError) as cm:
compile(empty_yield_from, "<test>", "exec")
self.assertIn("field value is required", str(cm.exception))
self.assertIn("field 'value' is required", str(cm.exception))

@support.cpython_only
def test_issue31592(self):
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions Parser/asdl.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -33,8 +33,7 @@
# See the EBNF at the top of the file to understand the logical connection
# between the various node types.

builtin_types = {'identifier', 'string', 'bytes', 'int', 'object', 'singleton',
'constant'}
builtin_types = {'identifier', 'string', 'int', 'constant'}

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update also a comment in Parser/Python.asdl.

I am wondering, should we keep constant or object?

@isidentical isidentical May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

neither of them are defined in ASDL spec, but I guess constant is more explicit about its job then object. So I'd go for keeping it as is, and using constant

@serhiy-storchaka serhiy-storchaka May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In any case we keep ast2obj_object() and obj2ast_object().

@isidentical isidentical May 6, 2020

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, because others are a symlink to it. Do you want me to change constant with object, or is it OK this way?


class AST:
def __repr__(self):
Expand Down
9 changes: 2 additions & 7 deletions Parser/asdl_c.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ def emit(s, depth=0, reflow=True):
if not opt and argtype != "int":
emit("if (!%s) {" % argname, 1)
emit("PyErr_SetString(PyExc_ValueError,", 2)
msg = "field %s is required for %s" % (argname, name)
msg = "field '%s' is required for %s" % (argname, name)
emit(' "%s");' % msg,
2, reflow=False)
emit('return NULL;', 2)
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -853,11 +853,9 @@ def visitModule(self, mod):
Py_INCREF((PyObject*)o);
return (PyObject*)o;
}
#define ast2obj_singleton ast2obj_object
#define ast2obj_constant ast2obj_object
#define ast2obj_identifier ast2obj_object
#define ast2obj_string ast2obj_object
#define ast2obj_bytes ast2obj_object

static PyObject* ast2obj_int(long b)
{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -1148,10 +1146,7 @@ def simpleSum(self, sum, name):
self.emit("Py_INCREF(astmodulestate_global->%s_singleton);" % t.name, 3)
self.emit("return astmodulestate_global->%s_singleton;" % t.name, 3)
self.emit("default:", 2)
self.emit('/* should never happen, but just in case ... */', 3)
code = "PyErr_Format(PyExc_SystemError, \"unknown %s found\");" % name
self.emit(code, 3, reflow=False)
self.emit("return NULL;", 3)
self.emit("Py_UNREACHABLE();", 3);
Comment thread
isidentical marked this conversation as resolved.
Outdated
self.emit("}", 1)
self.emit("}", 0)

Expand Down
Loading