Repository navigation
Fix filters.Mention matching other users without username - #5385
Open
Enesuygurs wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Enesuygurs wants to merge 1 commit into
Enesuygurs wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
A `User` passed to `filters.Mention` that has no username matched every text mention of another user without a username, because `None == None` was treated as a username match. Only compare usernames if the given user actually has one.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
filters.Mention(user)comparesuser.usernamewith the username of every text-mentioned user. When the given user has no username, that comparison isNone == None. So the filter matches a text mention of any user without a username, even when the user ids differ:Telegram uses text mentions for users who don't have a username, so this is the common case for them. The existing tests didn't catch it because every text-mentioned user in them has a username.
With this change, usernames are only compared when the given user actually has one. Matching by id and by
@usernamemention is unchanged.Check-list for PRs