Visitar URL original
[css-contain-1] Allow new features, in future? · Issue #5808 · w3c/csswg-drafts · GitHub
Skip to content

[css-contain-1] Allow new features, in future? #5808

Closed

Description

@svgeesus

The pubrules checker has a suggestion:

If it is the intention to incorporate new features in future updates of the Recommendation, 
please make sure to identify the document as intending to allow new features.
If it is the intention to incorporate new features in future updates of the Recommendation,
 please make sure to identify the document as intending to allow new features. 
Recommended text is:

    Future updates to this Recommendation may incorporate new features.

Include one of this source code:
<p>Future updates to this Recommendation may incorporate
 <a href="https://www.w3.org/2020/Process-20200915/#allow-new-features">new features<a>.</p>

@frivoal @tabatkins Do we want to do that? If so, now (before Monday) would be the time :)

Activity

  1. svgeesus commented on Dec 18, 2020

    @svgeesus
    CollaboratorAuthor

    Since if doesn't commit us to anything, but allows adding new features, should we add this to the CSSWG Proposed Rec boilerplate?

  2. tabatkins commented on Dec 18, 2020

    @tabatkins
    Member

    Yes and yes.

  3. fantasai commented on Dec 19, 2020

    @fantasai
    Collaborator

    I don't think we'll be adding features to the REC of css-contain-1, we'd be adding it to css-contain-2, which already exists.

  4. frivoal commented on Dec 20, 2020

    @frivoal
    Collaborator
    • We cannot. As 6.2.9 of the Process says:

      A Proposed Recommendation may identify itself as intending to allow new features (class 4 changes) after its initial publication as a Recommendation, as described in § 6.2.11.4 Revising a Recommendation: New Features. Such an allowance cannot be added to a technical report previously published as a Recommendation that did not allow such changes.

      css-contain-1 has already been a REC before, and didn't carry this text, so it cannot be added now.

      (this is intentional: RECs that predate Process 2020 could not gain new features, and may be normatively referenced by things that count on this property to be maintained. So as not to change the existing meaning of REC, only things that declare the intention of gaining new features prior to becoming a REC can do so)

    • We don't need to, since css-contain has a level 2, which deals with the new features.

  5. added
    Closed as Question AnsweredUsed when the issue is more of a question than a problem, and it's been answered.
    Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.
    on Dec 21, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Administrative TrackerFor external review / publication tracking issues.Closed as Question AnsweredUsed when the issue is more of a question than a problem, and it's been answered.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Testing UnnecessaryMemory aid - issue doesn't require testsTracked in DoCcss-contain-1

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions