where
is the floor function (Harary and Hill 1963). The
conjectured value can also be written as
(2)
The values for , 2, ... are then given by 0,
0, 0, 0, 1, 3, 9, 18, 36, 60, 100, 150, 225, 315, 441, 588, ... (OEIS A028723),
while the verified crossing numbers are tabulated in OEIS A000241.
Guy (1972) proved the conjecture for , a result extended to
by Pan and Richter (2007) and to by Aichholzer (2021).
OpenAI (2026) announced a proof that for every ,
attributed to an unreleased internal OpenAI model. The release supplies a Lean formalization
of the complete formula. Balko (2026) subsequently presented
a specialist exposition of the announced proof, simplifying
parts of the original argument. This extends the earlier inspection of the formal
statement reported by VibeMathed (2026), but an independent audit of the complete
formalization has not been established.
Balogh et al. (2026) improved the asymptotic lower
bound to
(5)
as .
Salazar (2026) gives a detailed exposition and extends the bound to abstract rotation systems
of , for .
Let
count four-vertex subsystems realizable by a good drawing
of
with one crossing, and let count those not realizable by any good
drawing of .
Then
(6)
For the rotation system induced by a good drawing, and ,
recovering the crossing bound. The stronger inequality with coefficient 1 in place
of 3 remains conjectural.