The pure semisimplicity conjecture asserts that a right pure semisimple ring has only finitely many isomorphism classes of indecomposable right modules. All these modules are finitely generated in this setting. This is the finite representation type condition, and the conjecture is equivalent to requiring every right pure semisimple ring to be left pure semisimple (Šaroch 2021).
Ren (2026) reported a counterexample, an upper triangular ring
where
is a division subring of a division
ring
and the upper-right entry is the natural
-
bimodule. Ren (2026) claims that
is right pure semisimple but neither left
pure semisimple nor of finite
representation type. The expanded construction uses a parameter
of infinite multiplicative order. Over
, the choices
,
3, 4, ... give pairwise Morita inequivalent rings. Parameters of finite order at least 2 instead yield
rings of finite
representation type. The accompanying Lean formalization covers only the original
counterexample, not the finite-order family or the Morita inequivalence results.
The claimed refutation remains subject to independent assessment. Ren (2026) reports
GPT-6 Astra assistance with the construction and proof,
and GPT-6.1 Sol and Claude Opus 5.5 assistance with formalization.
Generalov and Tursunbaev (2026) report another counterexample of this triangular form. They construct a division ring by adjoining a shift
to the division ring of
fractions of a rational algebra with generators
for
and relations
and
for
.
The shift satisfies
.
Taking the division subring generated over
by
and
as the upper-left entry gives a hereditary
ring claimed to be right pure semisimple
with infinitely many isomorphism classes of indecomposable
right modules.