Visitar URL original
Update dependency Verify.DiffPlex to 3.3.0 by renovate[bot] · Pull Request #525 · AwesomeAssertions/AwesomeAssertions · GitHub
Skip to content

Update dependency Verify.DiffPlex to 3.3.0 - #525

Merged
IT-VBFK merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x
Jun 30, 2026
Merged

Update dependency Verify.DiffPlex to 3.3.0#525
IT-VBFK merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x

Conversation

@renovate

@renovate renovate Bot commented Jun 29, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Confidence
Verify.DiffPlex 3.1.2 → 3.3.0 age confidence

Release Notes

VerifyTests/Verify.DiffPlex (Verify.DiffPlex)

v3.3.0

Compare Source

v3.2.0

Compare Source

  • #​459 change the default OutputType to Compact

Configuration

📅 Schedule: (UTC)

  • Branch creation
    • "after 4pm on monday"
  • Automerge
    • At any time (no schedule defined)

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate Bot added the dependencies Pull requests with dependency updates label Jun 29, 2026
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 29, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Test Results

    75 files  ±0      75 suites  ±0   3m 52s ⏱️ -13s
 6 310 tests ±0   6 310 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
58 585 runs  ±0  58 585 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 415845b. ± Comparison against base commit 789aba0.

This pull request removes 10 and adds 8 tests. Note that renamed tests count towards both. 
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)

AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+HavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHaveLength ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_length_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetLengthExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)
AwesomeAssertions.Specs.Streams.StreamAssertionSpecs+NotHavePosition ‑ When_a_throwing_stream_should_not_have_a_position_it_should_fail(exception: System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'GetPositionExceptionMessage'.)

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@IT-VBFK
IT-VBFK force-pushed the renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x branch from 062700a to 129a8e2 Compare June 30, 2026 16:42
@renovate
renovate Bot force-pushed the renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x branch from 129a8e2 to a450a37 Compare June 30, 2026 16:56
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Edited/Blocked Notification

Renovate will not automatically rebase this PR, because it does not recognize the last commit author and assumes somebody else may have edited the PR.

You can manually request rebase by checking the rebase/retry box above.

⚠️ Warning: custom changes will be lost.

@IT-VBFK IT-VBFK closed this Jun 30, 2026
@IT-VBFK
IT-VBFK deleted the renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x branch June 30, 2026 18:11
@IT-VBFK
IT-VBFK restored the renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x branch June 30, 2026 18:11
@renovate

renovate Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Renovate Ignore Notification

Because you closed this PR without merging, Renovate will ignore this update (3.3.0). You will get a PR once a newer version is released. To ignore this dependency forever, add it to the ignoreDeps array of your Renovate config.

If you accidentally closed this PR, or if you changed your mind: rename this PR to get a fresh replacement PR.

@IT-VBFK IT-VBFK reopened this Jun 30, 2026
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Jun 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

@coveralls

coveralls commented Jun 30, 2026 •
edited
Loading

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Coverage Report for CI Build 28466030312

Coverage increased (+0.005%) to 96.705%

Details

  • Coverage increased (+0.005%) from the base build.
  • Patch coverage: No coverable lines changed in this PR.
  • No coverage regressions found.

Uncovered Changes

No uncovered changes found.

Coverage Regressions

No coverage regressions found.

Coverage Stats

Coverage Status
Relevant Lines: 12907
Covered Lines: 12752
Line Coverage: 98.8%
Relevant Branches: 4030
Covered Branches: 3627
Branch Coverage: 90.0%
Branches in Coverage %: Yes
Coverage Strength: 39094.63 hits per line
💛 - Coveralls

@IT-VBFK
IT-VBFK merged commit 174f268 into main Jun 30, 2026
23 checks passed
@IT-VBFK
IT-VBFK deleted the renovate/verify.diffplex-3.x branch June 30, 2026 18:23
@lg2de

lg2de commented Jul 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@IT-VBFK, would it be possible to wait for a review by one of the other maintainers when changes to Renovate updates are required in future?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

dependencies Pull requests with dependency updates

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@coveralls @lg2de @IT-VBFK