Entries tagged 'community'

I keep running into things about the Zig community that intrigue me. The latest was this post by Loris Cro about “Critical Social Infrastructure for Zig Communities,” where these paragraphs really grabbed me:

We definitely also need bolder moves, but for now let's try to take it one step at a time, starting from structuring our communities around the idea that other interesting Zig communities exist out there, and that we should try harder to at least stay informed of what we all are collectively working on.

Conversely, we should also strive to make it easier for others to keep track of what we are doing. The time for bolder moves will come, but this a strong prerequisite before can we get to those.

Maybe it is because it is a new and small community compared to PHP’s, but the Zig community seems pretty great. Mitchell Hashimoto’s investment in the community is a good sign.

A lot of what Loris wrote about also brought to mind the IndieWeb principles and my own interest in promoting the ideal of doing open source development in the open using open tools. I chafe every time a community is centered on Discord or Slack, or finding that the real discussions and decision-making is happening in inaccessible places. One person’s tight-knit community can be another’s exclusive club.

Dries Buytaert, founder of the Drupal project, wrote a great article on “Solving the Maker-Taker problem,” about how Drupal built a system to recognize the contributions of community members and their sponsors. I am not wild about the “Maker-Taker” terminology because it gives me Election 2012 flashbacks, but I don’t have anything better to propose. (It was this post by Ben Werdmuller that brought the article to my attention.)

By transparently rewarding contributions and fostering collaboration, we can build healthier open source ecosystems. A credit system can help make open source more sustainable and fair, driving growth, competitiveness, and potentially creating thousands of new open source businesses.

It looks like there is a lot to like about the Drupal contribution credit system and their approach to community contribution in general.

This idea of how money and other benefits should flow within the free software (and open source) ecosystem has been on my mind for over 32 years and it is frustrating to me that I still don’t feel like I know how I feel about it.

It has been easy, at times, to feel like I have ended up on the wrong side of the deal. It felt pretty good when I made money (a little) from MySQL’s sale to Sun Microsystems. I also feel pretty dumb when I’m working alongside people on open source projects where they’re getting paid and I’m not, or someone else entirely is landing investments and spinning up large companies based on the work of communities to which I’ve contributed.

But this isn’t just a feeling I have encountered in my open source work, it was also something I felt when we ran our art supply store. It was a frustrating feeling to hustle to cut a good deal for a non-profit organization where you know the staff there is being paid a better salary than you could afford to pay yourself, and more often than not they would just rely on the big online suppliers rather than even bring the business to us, the small local business.

Maybe my feelings are complicated because I never managed to become post-economic. My version of becoming post-economic was supposed to be running an art supply store, and instead it turned me sub-economic.

A reason that I finally implemented better thread navigation for the PHP mailing list archives is because it was a bit of unfinished business — I had implemented it for the MySQL mailing lists (RIP), but never brought it back over to the PHP mailing lists. There, it accessed the MySQL database used by the Colobus server directly, but this time I exposed what I needed through NNTP.

An advantage to doing it this way is that anyone can still clone the site and run it against the NNTP server during development without needing any access to the database server. There may be future features that require coming up with ways of exposing more via NNTP, but I suspect a lot of ideas will not.

Another reason to implement thread navigation was that a hobby of mine is poking at the history of the PHP project, and I wanted to make it easier to dive into old threads like this thread from 2013 when Anthony Ferrara, a prominent PHP internals developer, left the list. (The tweet mentioned in the post is gone now, but you can find it and more context from this post on his blog.)

Reading this very long thread about the 2016 RFC to adopt a Code of Conduct (which never came to a vote) was another of those bits of history that I knew was out there but hadn’t been able to read quite so easily.

Which just leads me to tap the sign and point out that there is a de facto Code of Conduct and a group administering it.

I think implementing a search engine for the mailing list archives may be an upcoming project because it is still kind of a hassle to dig threads up. I’m thinking of using Manticore Search. Probably by building it into Colobus and exposing it via another NNTP extension.

As I continue to slog through my job search, I also continue to contribute in various ways to the PHP project. Taking some inspiration from the notion of “good trouble” so wonderfully modeled by John Lewis, I have been pushing against some of the boundaries to move and expand the project.

In a recent email to the Internals mailing list from Larry Garfield, he said:

And that's before we even run into the long-standing Internals aversion to even recognizing the existence of 3rd party tools for fear of "endorsing" anything. (With the inexplicable exception of Docuwiki.)

I can guess about a lot of the history there, but I think it is time to recognize that the state of the PHP ecosystem in 2024 has come a long way since the more rough-and-tumble days when related projects like Composer were experimental.

So I took the small step of submitting a couple of pull requests to add a chapter about Composer and an example of using it’s autoloader to the documentation.

The PHP documentation should be more inclusive, and I think the best way to make that happen is for me and others to just starting making the contributions. We need to shake off the notion that this is somehow unusual, not choose to say nothing about third-party tools for fear of “favoring” one over the other, and help support the whole PHP ecosystem though its primary documentation.

I would love to add a chapter on static analysis tools. And another one about linting and refactoring tools. Maybe a chapter on frameworks.

None of these have to be long or exhaustive. They only need to introduce the main concepts and give the reader a better sense of what is possible and the grounding to do more research on their own.

A big benefit of putting this sort of information in the documentation is that there are teams of people working on translating the documentation to other languages.

And yes, contributing to the PHP documentation can be kind of tedious because the tooling is pretty baroque. I am happy to help hammer any text that someone writes into the right shape to make it into the documentation, just send me what you have. If you want to do more of the heavy lifting, join the PHP documentation team email list and let’s make more good trouble together.

producing open source software by karl fogel (hardcopy) looks to be a very good book about the human side of producing open-source software.