Repository navigation
Teach genericAuto about new-style union construction. - #927
Merged
Merged
Conversation
| (name', e, _) <- extractUnionConstructor u | ||
| if | ||
| | name == name' -> fmap (R1 . M1) (extractR e) | ||
| | otherwise -> fmap L1 (extractL u) |
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This instance's implementation is actually not covered by the new tests - GHC seems to prefer to recurse to the right and hence the following instance gets used, not this one, though I didn't try very hard to convince it not to.
The underlying bug is very similar to dhall-lang#915, and in fact this builds on the fix for that in dhall-lang#918. Closes dhall-lang#926.
Collaborator
Author
|
Thanks! |
Collaborator
|
You're welcome! 🙂 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I discovered it wasn't working right in #926. The underlying bug is
very similar to #915, and in fact this builds on the fix for that in #918.
It looks like the single-constructor case is a different underlying
bug that I don't understand just yet, so let's tackle that separately.