Hold Local Coverage Against File Tables and Count Green Dependabot Bumps on a Promotion - #4047

…ry Short Names, Stub Read Grant (#4054)

## Summary

Promotes burndown round 1 of the attended run of 2026-11-10 from
`develop` to `main`.

- #4047: an attested local pass keeps `coverage=local` against a round
that only carries a file table. A promotion now reads green Dependabot
manifest bumps as covered, through the new `pr_review_promotion.py`. The
promotion case also counts an attestation over direct-to-`develop`
changes and excuses byte-identical renames.
- #4045: the loop skills resume a parked group on a recorded answer,
present each question once, accept a clone tip at or behind head, and
re-check `deferred` issues whose condition is checkable. An away run's
endings that cannot dispatch a promotion worker now report that.
- #4046: every registry entry carries a required, gated `shortName`. A
changed short name fails the spec gate as a migration.
- #4044: `pull-requests: read` on each caller stub's `validate` job, the
hub half of #2354. It takes effect once the lint job declares the scope.
- #4052, #4053, #4055, from other sessions: registry and rollout-tracker
updates. They declare Python for Vantage-Config, register the Employment
repository with its short name and pin, and reconcile the HolidayLights
entry.

Fixes #3955
Fixes #3909
Fixes #3901
Fixes #3905
Fixes #4012
Fixes #3830
Fixes #2669
Fixes #4023
Fixes #4028

#2354 stays open for the lint job's grant and the downstream rollout.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

…al Homes (#4169)

Disposes of both findings the per-unit tracker for
`.github/copilot-instructions.md` "GitHub Copilot Review Runbook" lists.

Closes on promotion: #4099

## Tracked Findings

- **Point to the canonical file-table coverage rules instead of
restating them.** Fixed. The runbook's completion paragraph restated,
sentence for sentence, the file-table coverage rules that
`GOVERNANCE.md` "PR Review Etiquette" holds. That breaks the file's own
rule, "Do not duplicate rules from `AGENTS.md`, `GOVERNANCE.md`,
`CODESTYLE.md`, or `WORKFLOW.md` here." Class sweep: the local review
pass found that the rest of that paragraph also restated "PR Review
Etiquette" and the `pr-review-conduct` Merge Gate (head and full-diff
coverage, the merge-blocking cases, the local-pass reading, the default
review policy, re-running the loop, and not trusting `mergeStateStatus:
CLEAN`). So the paragraph now points to those two homes, which between
them state every rule it held. It keeps its two sentences naming partial
coverage, a refusal, and an uncovered head as merge blockers.
`test_the_runbook_names_partial_coverage_as_a_state_that_blocks_a_merge`
in `tests/test_pr_review.py` pins those on purpose, and they state the
Merge Gate's blockers rather than a `GOVERNANCE.md` rule. A
sentence-level comparison of the runbook section against `GOVERNANCE.md`
found 7 verbatim sentences before this change and none after it. The
review-effort paragraph after it is left alone, since `GOVERNANCE.md`
does not state its rules.
- **A file table should not omit a renamed file with no changed line.**
Declined, since it asks to reverse a tested design rather than correct a
misdescription. #4047 added `RENAMED` to the set a file table may leave
out on purpose, and `tests/test_pr_review.py` pins it:
`test_a_lineless_rename_is_left_out` expects `coverage=table` for a
round whose table leaves out a `RENAMED` file with 0 additions and 0
deletions, and `test_a_rename_with_a_changed_line_is_not_left_out`
expects `coverage=none` once the rename changes a line. The text
describes that behavior accurately. After the first fix, the sentence
lives in `GOVERNANCE.md` "PR Review Etiquette" and the
`pr-review-conduct` Merge Gate, both of which match the tested behavior,
so no text changes for it.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>